Why teams pick it
Keep customer data in-house with privacy-focused tooling.
Compare community-driven replacements for Weights & Biases in mlops: experiment tracking & model registry workflows. We curate active, self-hostable options with transparent licensing so you can evaluate the right fit quickly.

Recent commits in the last 6 months
MIT, Apache, and similar licenses
Counts reflect projects currently indexed as alternatives to Weights & Biases.
These projects match the most common migration paths for teams replacing Weights & Biases.

Version, share, and serve ML models via OCI image registry
Why teams choose it
Watch for
No graphical user interface; CLI‑only interaction
Migration highlight
CI/CD pipeline integration
Automatically push trained models to a Harbor registry after each training run.

Human‑centric framework for building, scaling, and deploying AI systems
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Primarily Python‑centric, limiting non‑Python ecosystems
Migration highlight
Rapid notebook prototyping
Iterate quickly on new algorithms with built‑in versioning and visualizations, then promote the notebook to a reusable flow.

Track, visualize, and compare AI experiments effortlessly
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires self‑hosting and maintenance
Migration highlight
Training a deep translation model
Track loss, accuracy, and resource usage, visualize progress, and compare hyperparameter variations across runs.

Version, track, and manage ML models end-to-end
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires infrastructure setup (Docker/K8s, database)
Migration highlight
Track experiments with hyperparameters and metrics
Data scientists log each run, compare accuracy, and reproduce results easily.

Unified, high-performance gateway for industrial-grade LLM applications
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Self‑hosting required; users must manage Docker and a database like ClickHouse
Migration highlight
Real‑time chat assistant with multi‑model fallback
Seamlessly route requests between OpenAI and Anthropic, maintaining sub‑millisecond latency and automatic retries on failures.

Automagical suite to streamline AI experiment, orchestration, and serving
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Feature‑rich UI can be overwhelming for beginners
Migration highlight
Rapid prototyping to production
Track experiments, version datasets, and deploy a model endpoint in under 5 minutes, ensuring reproducibility.

Unified platform for tracking, evaluating, and deploying AI models
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Advanced scaling may require additional infrastructure configuration
Migration highlight
Experiment tracking for scikit‑learn models
Automatic logging of parameters, metrics, and artifacts enables easy comparison across runs.
Teams replacing Weights & Biases in mlops: experiment tracking & model registry workflows typically weigh self-hosting needs, integration coverage, and licensing obligations.
Tip: shortlist one hosted and one self-hosted option so stakeholders can compare trade-offs before migrating away from Weights & Biases.