Find Open-Source Alternatives
Discover powerful open-source replacements for popular commercial software. Save on costs, gain transparency, and join a community of developers.
Discover powerful open-source replacements for popular commercial software. Save on costs, gain transparency, and join a community of developers.
Compare community-driven replacements for Tetrate Service Bridge in service mesh workflows. We curate active, self-hostable options with transparent licensing so you can evaluate the right fit quickly.
These projects match the most common migration paths for teams replacing Tetrate Service Bridge.
Why teams pick it
Simple standalone deployment for quick start
Recent commits in the last 6 months
MIT, Apache, and similar licenses
Counts reflect projects currently indexed as alternatives to Tetrate Service Bridge.
Why teams pick it
Automate scheduling with AI-driven assistants.
Secure, connect, and monitor microservices with a transparent service mesh
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Operational complexity can be steep for new adopters
Migration highlight
Canary Deployments
Gradually shift traffic to new versions while monitoring health, reducing risk of full rollouts.
Dynamic service discovery, configuration, and DNS for cloud-native apps
Lightweight, security-first service mesh for Kubernetes workloads
Universal Envoy-based service mesh for Kubernetes, VMs, and multi-zone
Lightweight, sidecar-free service mesh for Kubernetes
Kernel-native, sidecar-less service mesh with eBPF performance
Proxyless Java Service Mesh Powered by Bytecode Enhancement
Teams replacing Tetrate Service Bridge in service mesh workflows typically weigh self-hosting needs, integration coverage, and licensing obligations.
Tip: shortlist one hosted and one self-hosted option so stakeholders can compare trade-offs before migrating away from Tetrate Service Bridge.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires a Java runtime environment
Migration highlight
Microservice registration and discovery
Services automatically register and discover each other via DNS/HTTP, with health checks preventing routing to unhealthy instances.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Limited advanced traffic routing compared to some meshes
Migration highlight
Secure inter-service communication
Automatic mutual TLS encrypts all pod-to-pod traffic without code changes.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires Envoy knowledge for deep customizations
Migration highlight
PCI-compliant regional routing
Ensures traffic from Swiss services stays within Switzerland, meeting compliance requirements.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires Kubernetes 1.11+ and Helm v3
Migration highlight
Gradual mesh adoption
Introduce mesh capabilities service‑by‑service without affecting existing workloads.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires kernel version with eBPF support
Migration highlight
High-frequency trading platform
Achieves sub-millisecond request latency while enforcing mutual TLS without sidecars.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Limited to Java ecosystems
Migration highlight
Circuit Breaking for Spring Cloud Services
Automatic fault tolerance injected via a plugin without deploying sidecars