Find Open-Source Alternatives
Discover powerful open-source replacements for popular commercial software. Save on costs, gain transparency, and join a community of developers.
Discover powerful open-source replacements for popular commercial software. Save on costs, gain transparency, and join a community of developers.
Compare community-driven replacements for Pipedream in workflow automation workflows. We curate active, self-hostable options with transparent licensing so you can evaluate the right fit quickly.
Run on infrastructure you control
Recent commits in the last 6 months
MIT, Apache, and similar licenses
Counts reflect projects currently indexed as alternatives to Pipedream.
These projects match the most common migration paths for teams replacing Pipedream.
Why teams pick it
Self-hosted deployment keeps all workflow data on your own servers
Why teams pick it
Teams requiring self-hosted automation with full data sovereignty
Unified integration platform for SaaS apps and AI agents
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Free self‑hosted version has limited features
Migration highlight
CRM platform adds Google Calendar sync
Users connect Google accounts in minutes, and calendar events sync automatically, reducing development time from weeks to hours.
Self-hosted business automation platform connecting apps without code
Open source automation platform replacing Zapier with TypeScript
Build event‑driven automations with 1,000+ integrations, no code required.
Low-code AI automation for social data collection and analysis
Open-source low-code platform for API integration and workflow automation
Lightning-fast code-first workflow automation engine for Node.js
Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities
Event-driven automation system connecting services with modular agents
Unified API that simplifies integration across SaaS products
Event-Driven Declarative Orchestration Platform for Modern Workflows
Free IFTTT/Zapier alternative for developers using GitHub Actions
Teams replacing Pipedream in workflow automation workflows typically weigh self-hosting needs, integration coverage, and licensing obligations.
Tip: shortlist one hosted and one self-hosted option so stakeholders can compare trade-offs before migrating away from Pipedream.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires infrastructure and maintenance expertise for self-hosting
Migration highlight
GDPR-Compliant Customer Onboarding
European SaaS company automates user registration workflows while keeping all personal data within EU-hosted servers, ensuring regulatory compliance without third-party data processors.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires self-hosting infrastructure and maintenance overhead
Migration highlight
AI-Assisted Data Processing
Non-technical staff clean and transform data using ASK AI in code pieces without writing code, reducing dependency on developers.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Free tier imposes usage limits
Migration highlight
Sync new GitHub issues to a Google Sheet
Automatically adds each new issue as a row, keeping tracking sheets up‑to‑date.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Project is in alpha; breaking changes may occur between releases
Migration highlight
Social listening dashboard
Continuously collect brand mentions from Twitter and Reddit, analyze sentiment, and push daily summaries to a Slack channel.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Currently in alpha stage with some features missing or disabled
Migration highlight
Embedded SaaS Integrations
Enable customers to connect your product with their existing tools, reducing churn and increasing product stickiness through native integration experiences.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Code-first approach requires programming knowledge; no visual workflow builder
Migration highlight
High-Volume Webhook Processing
Handle 500+ webhook requests per second on a single CPU core with sub-10ms average response times and minimal memory footprint.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires Node.js knowledge for advanced customization and local deployment
Migration highlight
AI-Powered Customer Support Automation
Build LangChain-based agents that process support tickets, query internal knowledge bases, and route complex issues to human agents while maintaining data privacy through self-hosting.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Web interface lacks authentication, requiring network-level access controls
Migration highlight
Social Media Cross-Posting
Automatically repost Twitter updates to Tumblr blog, maintaining presence across platforms without manual duplication
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Webhook support and monitoring are still in development
Migration highlight
Customer Support Dashboard
Consolidates tickets from Jira, Zendesk, and GitHub into a single view for faster issue resolution.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
YAML-based configuration may require learning curve for teams unfamiliar with declarative syntax
Migration highlight
Event-Driven Data Pipelines
Automatically trigger ETL workflows when new files arrive in S3 or messages land in Kafka, processing data in real-time without manual intervention.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Minimum 5-minute polling interval may not suit real-time needs
Migration highlight
RSS Feed Monitoring
Automatically post new Hacker News articles to Slack when they exceed 300 points, filtering duplicates and formatting content for team review.