Find Open-Source Alternatives
Discover powerful open-source replacements for popular commercial software. Save on costs, gain transparency, and join a community of developers.
Discover powerful open-source replacements for popular commercial software. Save on costs, gain transparency, and join a community of developers.
Compare community-driven replacements for Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) in container orchestration workflows. We curate active, self-hostable options with transparent licensing so you can evaluate the right fit quickly.
These projects match the most common migration paths for teams replacing Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE).
Why teams pick it
Nomad deploys and manages Docker, Podman, executable, Java, and QEMU workloads across on-prem and cloud environments, offering high-availability, GPU support, and seamless integration with Terraform, Consul, and Vault.
Run on infrastructure you control
Recent commits in the last 6 months
MIT, Apache, and similar licenses
Counts reflect projects currently indexed as alternatives to Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE).
Why teams pick it
Quick‑start Docker deployment with minimal configuration
Simple, flexible orchestrator for containers, legacy apps, and VMs
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Enterprise‑only features require a paid edition
Migration highlight
Hybrid microservice and batch processing
Run Docker‑based microservices alongside legacy batch jobs on the same cluster, sharing resources and scheduling policies.
Lightweight, single-package Kubernetes for laptops, edge, and CI/CD
Lightweight, production‑ready Kubernetes in a single <100 MB binary
Enterprise platform for secure, multi-cloud Kubernetes application delivery
Unified platform to deploy and manage Kubernetes at scale
Centralized automation for thousands of Kubernetes clusters everywhere
Teams replacing Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) in container orchestration workflows typically weigh self-hosting needs, integration coverage, and licensing obligations.
Tip: shortlist one hosted and one self-hosted option so stakeholders can compare trade-offs before migrating away from Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE).
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Limited to single‑node clusters unless manually clustered
Migration highlight
Local development environment
Spin up a full K8s cluster on a laptop in minutes, enabling testing of Helm charts and manifests.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Limited built‑in cloud provider integrations; relies on external CSI/CCM
Migration highlight
Edge gateway cluster for remote sensor aggregation
Collects and processes sensor data locally with minimal latency and resource consumption.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Steeper learning curve for complex hybrid setups
Migration highlight
Hybrid Cloud Migration
Seamlessly move workloads between AWS, GCP, and on‑prem clusters while maintaining consistent policies and observability.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires underlying OS support as defined in the support matrix
Migration highlight
Hybrid Cloud Cluster Management
Consistently provision and monitor Kubernetes clusters across on‑premise and public cloud environments from a single dashboard.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Main branch code is under active development and may be unstable
Migration highlight
Multi‑cloud fleet management
Provision, update, and monitor clusters uniformly across AWS, GCP, and Azure from a single console.