Find Open-Source Alternatives
Discover powerful open-source replacements for popular commercial software. Save on costs, gain transparency, and join a community of developers.
Discover powerful open-source replacements for popular commercial software. Save on costs, gain transparency, and join a community of developers.
Compare community-driven replacements for Formester in form builders & survey tools workflows. We curate active, self-hostable options with transparent licensing so you can evaluate the right fit quickly.

Run on infrastructure you control
Recent commits in the last 6 months
MIT, Apache, and similar licenses
Counts reflect projects currently indexed as alternatives to Formester.
These projects match the most common migration paths for teams replacing Formester.
Why teams pick it
Self-hostable with Docker or cloud-hosted with integrations for Slack, Notion, Zapier, and n8n
Why teams pick it
Organizations with strict data‑privacy regulations

Open Source Survey Platform for User Feedback Collection
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Enterprise features require paid licensing
Migration highlight
In-App User Feedback Collection
Gather contextual feedback at specific touchpoints in your application without code changes, improving product decisions with targeted user insights

Build mobile-ready, multilingual surveys and forms without code.

Open-source conversational form builder for engaging surveys and quizzes

Open-source no-code form builder with unlimited submissions

Self‑hosted form builder, now deprecated – use for testing only

Create beautiful, customizable surveys and polls effortlessly

Render dynamic JSON forms across any JavaScript framework effortlessly

Open-source survey platform with unlimited questions and responses
Teams replacing Formester in form builders & survey tools workflows typically weigh self-hosting needs, integration coverage, and licensing obligations.
Tip: shortlist one hosted and one self-hosted option so stakeholders can compare trade-offs before migrating away from Formester.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires own server and maintenance effort
Migration highlight
Customer satisfaction survey
Collect feedback after support interactions, export results to CSV for analysis.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
AGPL-3.0 license requires source disclosure for modified versions
Migration highlight
Customer Feedback Surveys
Collect detailed customer insights with conditional questions that adapt based on satisfaction scores and response patterns
Why teams choose it
Watch for
AGPL-3.0 license requires derivative works to be open-sourced
Migration highlight
Lead Generation for Marketing Teams
Embed unlimited forms across landing pages with Slack notifications for instant lead alerts and analytics to track conversion rates
Why teams choose it
Watch for
No longer maintained; dependencies contain known vulnerabilities
Migration highlight
Employee satisfaction survey
Collect anonymous feedback from staff using a self‑hosted form without exposing data to third‑party services.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires Node.js environment to run
Migration highlight
Customer satisfaction survey
Gather actionable insights while preserving anonymity
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires a custom backend to persist responses
Migration highlight
Multi‑page registration wizard
Collect step‑by‑step user information with auto‑save and validation, storing data in the company’s database.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires technical expertise for server setup and maintenance
Migration highlight
Academic Research Studies
Universities collect sensitive participant data with full GDPR compliance and institutional data sovereignty while leveraging multilingual support for international studies.