Find Open-Source Alternatives
Discover powerful open-source replacements for popular commercial software. Save on costs, gain transparency, and join a community of developers.
Discover powerful open-source replacements for popular commercial software. Save on costs, gain transparency, and join a community of developers.
Compare community-driven replacements for CircleCI in ci/cd pipelines workflows. We curate active, self-hostable options with transparent licensing so you can evaluate the right fit quickly.
Run on infrastructure you control
Recent commits in the last 6 months
MIT, Apache, and similar licenses
Counts reflect projects currently indexed as alternatives to CircleCI.
These projects match the most common migration paths for teams replacing CircleCI.
Why teams pick it
Organizations requiring self-hosted DevOps infrastructure with full data sovereignty
Why teams pick it
Teams that need on‑prem CI/CD with full data ownership
Multi-cloud continuous delivery platform for fast, safe software releases.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Complex microservice architecture can increase operational overhead
Migration highlight
Canary release of a new microservice across AWS and Kubernetes
Detect performance regressions early while automatically promoting the version to production once safety thresholds are met.
Automate, visualize, and deliver software with GoCD pipelines
Kubernetes-native continuous delivery platform powered by GitOps Toolkit
Enterprise-grade CI/CD platform with visual workflows and CLI
Scalable automation server for continuous integration and delivery
End-to-End DevOps Platform with Git, CI/CD, and Registries
GitOps-powered continuous delivery for Kubernetes, fully declarative.
Full-cycle CI/CD for Kubernetes using Git, Dockerfile, Helm
Self‑hosted CI/CD platform with plugin‑driven customization
Teams replacing CircleCI in ci/cd pipelines workflows typically weigh self-hosting needs, integration coverage, and licensing obligations.
Tip: shortlist one hosted and one self-hosted option so stakeholders can compare trade-offs before migrating away from CircleCI.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
User interface can feel dated
Migration highlight
Automated Release Pipeline for Microservices
Ensures consistent, repeatable deployments across staging and production environments.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Steep learning curve for custom resource definitions
Migration highlight
Git‑driven application deployment
Consistent, repeatable releases directly from version‑controlled manifests.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
All state stored in a database; requires regular DB backups
Migration highlight
Microservice deployment pipeline
Automated builds and deployments across dev, staging, and prod using shared workflow templates.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Steeper learning curve for complex pipelines
Migration highlight
Automated Build and Test Pipeline
Code changes trigger builds, run unit/integration tests, and report results instantly, reducing manual QA effort.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Still reaching feature parity with Drone CI for pipeline capabilities
Migration highlight
Consolidated DevOps Stack for Startups
Replace separate GitHub, CircleCI, and Docker Hub subscriptions with a single self-hosted platform, reducing costs and integration complexity while maintaining full control over code and artifacts.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Steep learning curve for GitOps newcomers
Migration highlight
Production application rollout
Deploys new releases from Git, automatically syncs to clusters, and rolls back on failure.
Why teams choose it
Watch for
CLI‑only interface may require scripting for complex UI needs
Migration highlight
Microservice deployment with automated caching
Accelerated build times and consistent releases for microservice architectures
Why teams choose it
Watch for
Requires Node.js and MongoDB setup
Migration highlight
Deploying a Node.js web app to a private server
Automated tests run, build artifacts packaged, and deployment triggered after each push.